Utah: chemical quantity omissions

Summary: Chemical records in FracFocus range from less than one pound to over 1 million pounds. Disclosures that fail to report quantity data obscure a critical piece of information. Open-FF found that Utah had 854 such disclosures by 32 different operators.

Background on chemical quantity omissions
  • The national disclosure instrument,ย FracFocus, documents the fracking chemicals that have been used in over 220,000 fracking jobs in the US since 2011. This extensive data set is especially important because it is one of the few resources available to the public about fracking chemicals. As such, FracFocus should be central to analyses and debates about fracking patterns and impacts. However, poor data integrity can undermine the usefulness of this resource.
  • The Open-FF project is trying toย make errors in FracFocus more visibleย to stakeholders. Our aim is to alert users of FracFocus data to weaknesses and to encourage operators to correct problems and prevent future errors.
  • Fracking chemical quantities reported in FracFocus can range from less than one pound to over one million pounds. Open-FF has found that data records for chemical quantity are incomplete in over 35,000 disclosures and more are added monthly. These FracFocus data omissions prevent users from understanding the scope of the environmental and public health risks associated with hydraulic fracturing operations.
  • This post outlines the data omissions for this state using a FracFocus data set downloaded on Feb 19, 2025.

The scope of Utah’s data omission issue

As of this date, Utah has 4,104 disclosures in FracFocus. We have detected records with omitted quantities in 20.8% of those disclosures. The following figure illustrates Utah’s pattern over time.

Bar chart showing the yearly portion of disclosures in Utah that have records with omitted quantity data.

The following table summarizes the operating companies with affected disclosures in Utah. (Only companies with at least 10 affected disclosures are listed.) To see examples of data omission, follow “Link to Report” for summaries of specific companies. On those pages, you will find lists of the chemicals that haven’t been fully reported.

Operatordetected number
of disclosures
in Utah
link to
Open-FF
report
Middle Fork Energy Parterns, LLC209
Finley Resources, Inc.151link to report
EP Energy127link to report
Crescent Point Energy US Corp86
Berry Petroleum Company, LLC78
Uinta Wax Operating, LLC64
Newfield Exploration34link to report
Altamont Energy13
Bill Barrett Corp12

As of this date, many companies continue to publish disclosures without full quantity data.

Quantity omissions in Open-FF data sets

For Open-FF data sets, although we detect and flag omitted data, we do not attempt to fill it with estimated values. Instead we leave the values as โ€œno dataโ€ so that any aggregate calculations are not compromised by data not directly reported by the industry. In cases in which a user wishes to use an estimate, we suggest using the median PercentHFJob value for that chemical as a proxy. From there, a mass can be calculated from the โ€œjob_massโ€ in the data set.


Title image credit: Becky Mansfield (modified by author)


Published by gwallison

I am a data analyst and programmer. I am interested in making "public" data more accessible.

Leave a Reply