Texas: chemical quantity omissions

Summary: Chemical records in FracFocus range from less than one pound to over 1 million pounds. Disclosures that fail to report quantity data obscure a critical piece of information. Open-FF found that Texas had 21,676 such disclosures by 490 different operators.

Background on chemical quantity omissions
  • The national disclosure instrument,ย FracFocus, documents the fracking chemicals that have been used in over 220,000 fracking jobs in the US since 2011. This extensive data set is especially important because it is one of the few resources available to the public about fracking chemicals. As such, FracFocus should be central to analyses and debates about fracking patterns and impacts. However, poor data integrity can undermine the usefulness of this resource.
  • The Open-FF project is trying toย make errors in FracFocus more visibleย to stakeholders. Our aim is to alert users of FracFocus data to weaknesses and to encourage operators to correct problems and prevent future errors.
  • Fracking chemical quantities reported in FracFocus can range from less than one pound to over one million pounds. Open-FF has found that data records for chemical quantity are incomplete in over 35,000 disclosures and more are added monthly. These FracFocus data omissions prevent users from understanding the scope of the environmental and public health risks associated with hydraulic fracturing operations.
  • This post outlines the data omissions for this state using a FracFocus data set downloaded on Feb 19, 2025.

The scope of Texas’s data omission issue

As of this date, Texas has 89,010 disclosures in FracFocus with chemical records. We have detected records with omitted quantities in 24.4% of those disclosures. The following figure illustrates Texas’s pattern over time.

Bar chart showing the yearly portion of disclosures in Texas that have records with omitted quantity data.

The following table summarizes the operating companies with affected disclosures in Texas. (Only those companies with 40 or more affected disclosures are listed.) To see examples of data omission, follow “Link to Report” for summaries of specific companies. On those pages, you will find lists of the chemicals that haven’t been fully reported.

Operatordetected number
of disclosures
in Texas
link to
Open-FF
report
Pioneer Natural Resources3,292link to report
EOG Resources, Inc.2,141link to report
Chesapeake Operating, Inc.958link to report
BHP Billiton Petroleum918link to report
Marathon Oil783link to report
ConocoPhillips Company/Burlington Resources728link to report
XTO Energy/ExxonMobil723link to report
SM Energy560link to report
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation545link to report
Blackbeard Operating519link to report
Lewis Energy Group439
Occidental Oil and Gas410link to report
Devon Energy Production Company L. P.341link to report
Murphy Exploration and Production USA328link to report
Parsley Energy Operations, LLC314link to report
EP Energy287link to report
Apache Corporation283link to report
CrownQuest Operating, LLC227
Penn Virginia Corporation223link to report
COG Operating LLC217link to report
Hunt Oil Company202
Linn Energy, LLC188link to report
EXCO/HGI JV Assets, LLC177
Chevron USA Inc.176link to report
DE3 Operating LLC165link to report
Discovery Natural Resources LLC165link to report
Atlas Energy, L.P.143
Omni Oil & Gas, Inc.132
Callon Petroleum Operating Company132
Matador Production Company124
Laredo Petroleum, Inc.121
PDC Energy111link to report
SilverBow Resources110
SandRidge Energy107link to report
FELIX ENERGY HOLDINGS II, LLC105
Diamondback E&P LLC105
Athlon Energy Operating LLC102
Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation100
BP America Production Company100link to report
Ovintiv USA Inc.99
Comstock Oil & Gas97
Surge Operating, LLC86
Steward Energy II, LLC83
Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.83link to report
Cimarex Energy Co.83link to report
Ensign Operating LLC69
Energen Resources Corporation65
Unit Petroleum65
HighPeak Energy Holdings, LLC.63
Centennial Resource Production, LLC62
American Energy Permian Basin62
Newark E&P Operating, LLC59
Texas American Resources Company59
Rockcliff Energy Operating59
Sabalo Operating, LLC58
Rosetta Resources57
Shell Oil Company affiliate56
Guidon Energy Management Services LLC56
Ring Energy, Inc.56
EnerVest, Ltd.54
Forest Oil Corporation52
Halc?n Operating Co., Inc.52
Stonegate Production52
Talisman Energy USA Inc.52link to report
Lime Rock Resources, LP51
Valence Operating Company50link to report
Continental Resources, Inc47link to report
Sundance Energy46
Lonestar Resources, Inc.45
Grit Oil and Gas Management, LLC41
WPX Energy41
TEP Barnett USA, LLC41
PRI Operating, LLC41
Endeavor Natural Gas, LP41

As of this date, many companies continue to publish disclosures without full quantity data.

Quantity omissions in Open-FF data sets

For Open-FF data sets, although we detect and flag omitted data, we do not attempt to fill it with estimated values. Instead we leave the values as โ€œno dataโ€ so that any aggregate calculations are not compromised by data not directly reported by the industry. In cases in which a user wishes to use an estimate, we suggest using the median PercentHFJob value for that chemical as a proxy. From there, a mass can be calculated from the โ€œjob_massโ€ in the data set.


Title image credit: Becky Mansfield (modified by author)


Published by gwallison

I am a data analyst and programmer. I am interested in making "public" data more accessible.

Leave a Reply